Keywords:
Related Articles:

Abstract
This comprehensive analysis examines the protracted conflict in Namibia during the mid-1980s, investigating the historical roots, contemporary dynamics, and international efforts to achieve a peaceful resolution. The article explores the historical background of Namibian colonialism under German and South African rule and analyzes the development of nationalist resistance movements. The research investigates the legal and political dimensions of the Namibia problem, including United Nations recognition of South West Africa People's Organization (SWAPO) as the legitimate representative of the Namibian people and the international status of the territory. The study examines the military conflict between South African forces and SWAPO guerrillas, analyzing the regionalization of the conflict through South African operations in neighboring countries. The article assesses international mediation efforts, including United Nations initiatives, Western contact group diplomacy, and regional African approaches to conflict resolution. The research also evaluates the obstacles to a negotiated settlement, including South African domestic politics, superpower competition, and regional security concerns. Furthermore, the analysis identifies potential pathways toward a sustainable political solution for Namibia.
Full Text
The Namibia conflict represented one of the most protracted and complex decolonization struggles in Africa, with this article providing a comprehensive analysis of its dimensions and resolution prospects during the mid-1980s. The research begins by examining the historical background of the Namibia problem, tracing German colonial occupation, South African mandate administration after World War I, and the subsequent illegal occupation despite United Nations revocation of the mandate. The analysis explores the development of nationalist resistance, examining the emergence of SWAPO as the dominant liberation movement and its international diplomatic campaign for Namibian independence. The article investigates the military dimensions of the conflict, analyzing the guerrilla warfare conducted by SWAPO's armed wing and South African counterinsurgency operations that extended into neighboring Angola and Zambia. The study examines the international legal framework, assessing advisory opinions of the International Court of Justice, United Nations resolutions, and the evolving international consensus on Namibian self-determination. The research evaluates mediation efforts, including the Western Contact Group initiative, United Nations settlement proposals, and regional diplomatic approaches through the Frontline States and Organization of African Unity. Based on the comprehensive assessment, the article analyzes the major obstacles to a negotiated settlement, including South African strategic interests, internal political dynamics, superpower competition, and linkage to other regional conflicts. The findings provide valuable insights into the dynamics of protracted decolonization conflicts and contribute to understanding how international law, diplomacy, and armed struggle interact in struggles for self-determination.