1. Party Realignment:
What? When? How? 1
A Comparative Study of Past Realignments 3
The Concept of Party Realignment 5
The Partial Character of Realignments 10
2. Some Hypothetical
Scenarios 11
Formation of a Party System 11
The Prerealignment Period 14
Scenario 1: No Major Realignment 16
Scenario 2: Realignment of the Two Existing
Parties 18
Scenario 3: Realignment of the Existing
Parties through the
Absorption of a Third Party 20
Scenario 4: Realignment through the
Replacement of One Major Party 22
Scenario 5: Realignment through the
Replacement of Both Old Parties 23
3. The Realignment
Process: A Preliminary Statement 26
Five Variables 28
Searching the Past 36
4. Slavery Polarizes the
Nation 39
Ascendancy of the Compromisers 39
The Disruption of the Old Parties 48
Division of the Whig Party 57
5. The Realignment of the
1850s 63
A New Major Party: The Republicans 65
Substance of the Realignment 71
Solidification of the New Alignment 84
6. The Agrarian Revolt
and the Rise of Populism 92
The Farmers Enter Politics 94
Tensions within the Old Parties 101
The Protest Forces Regather 106
The Major Parties Respond Slowly 109
The Prairie State Parties of 1890 113
Democratic Radicalism in the South 118
7. The Realignment of the
1890s 120
Creation of the People's Party 120
Polarization of the Democratic Party 123
Silver Democrats Capture the Party 135
The Populists Are Absorbed 138
The Critical Election of 1896 140
Substance of the Realignment 146
Persistence of the Civil War Alignment 153
8. Realignment Averted:
The Progressive Era 155
Diffuse Character of the Progressive
Movement 156
A Bipartisan Responsiveness 158
The Accidents of Leadership 162
The Deviation of 1912 165
9. Minor Realignments of
the 1920s 167
The Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party 168
La Follette, McNary-Haugenism, and Al Smith
171
The "Al Smith Revolution" in the
East 176
10. The Realignment of
the 1930s 183
Herbert Hoover and Limited Intervention 184
Before 1932: The Democrats Move Slowly 190
After 1932: The Democrats Commit Themselves
193
Substance of the Realignment 199
Evolution of the New Deal Party System 212
The Retreat toward the Center 214
11. Aftershocks of the
New Deal Earthquake- in the North 218
North Dakota: The NPL Switches Parties 219
Wisconsin: La Follette Progressivism
Changes Parties 222
Minnesota: The Farmer-Labor Movement Shifts
Parties 226
Pennsylvania: Patronage Republicans Switch
Parties 229
Two-Stage Realignment in Other States 233
The
Rise of the Programmatic Liberal Democrats 239
12. Aftershocks of the
New Deal Earthquake- in the South 245
The Dixiecrat Revolt 247
Metropolitan Republicanism in the South 254
From Thurmond to Wallace: The Protest Vote
259
The Second Stage of Southern Realignment
262
The Programmatic Republican Conservatives
265
Variations in the Second Stage 269
13. The Realignment
Process: An Amplified Statement 275
14. Some Further Notes on
Party Dynamics 299
The Static, One-Dimensional Model 299
An Open or a Closed Party System? 303
15. Crosscutting Issues
since the New Deal 308
Communism as a Realigning Issue 310
Race as a Realigning Issue 314
Vietnam as a Realigning Issue 319
Law and Order and the "Social
Issue" 322
16. Current Trends in
Party Strength 332
The Convergence of Party Strength 332
A Competitive Party Balance 337
Alienation and Independence 340
17. Whither the American
Party System? 355
A Black-White Political Alignment? 355
A Rebirth of the New Deal Party System? 369
Index 375
Tables
6-1. Congressional Votes
on the Passage of the Inflation Bill of 1874, by Region and Party 103
6-2. Votes in the House
of Representatives on Railroad and Silver Legislation, 1878-86, by Region and
Party 112
7-1. Congressional Votes
in 1893 on Repeal of the Silver Purchase Act, by Region and Party 134
7-2. Democratic Losses in
Selected Urban Centers in 1896 148
9-1. Democratic Gains in
Twenty-five Predominantly Protestant Midwestern Counties, 1928 175
9-2. Comparison of the
1928 Democratic Vote for President with the 1924 Democratic Vote and 1924
Democratic plus Progressive Vote, Selected Urban Areas 179
11-1. The Two-Stage
Realignment in Sixteen Northern States, Shown by Gains and Losses in Democratic
Party Strength 234
16-1. Changes in
Political Affiliation of Various Population Groups, 1960 and 1970 348
17-1. Democratic Gains in
Five Southern States, 1968-70 364
Figures
2-1. Positions of Voting
Blocs on Three Issues 12
2-2. A New Line of
Cleavage Cuts across the Old 15
2-3. Realignment of the
Two Existing Parties 19
2-4. A Strong and Growing
Third Party Foreshadows Realignment 21
2-5. Realignment through
the Replacement of One Party 23
2-6. Realignment through
the Replacement of Both Parties 24
5-1. The Realignment of
the 1850s: The Prerealignment Period 72
5-2. The Realignment of
the 1850s 73
5-3. Free-Soil Strength
in the North, 1848 Presidential Vote 76
5-4. Republican Strength
in Eleven Northern States, Average of 1860 and 1864 Republican Presidential
Vote 77
5-5. The Realignment of
the 1850s in the North, as Shown by the Rise in the Whig-Republican Percentage
of the Presidential Vote in Selected Areas, 1836-76 82
5-6. Pro-Democratic Realignment,
as Shown by the Democratic Percentage of the Presidential Vote in Four Northern
Counties, 1836-76 84
7-1. Long-term Price
Decline after the Civil War 125
7-2. The Realignment of
the 1890s 146
10-1. The Realignment of
the 1930s 199
10-2. Democratic Percentage
of the Presidential Vote in Selected Counties, 1920-48 201
10-3. Democratic
Percentage of Two-Party Enrollment in New York, Selected Areas, 1915-70 205
10-4. Democratic
Percentage of Two-Party Registration in West Virginia, Selected Counties, 1928-70
206
10-5. Democratic
Percentage of Two-Party Registration in Pennsylvania, Selected Counties,
1926-71 207
10-6. Democratic
Percentage of Two-Party Registration in Oregon, Selected Counties, 1918-68 208
10-7. Democratic
Percentage of Two-Party Registration in California, Selected Counties, 1928-70
209
11-1. Democratic
Percentage of Two-Party Vote Compared with Democratic Percentage of Two-Party
Registration, Philadelphia, 1924-70 231
11-2. Democratic
Percentage of Two-Party Vote Compared with Democratic Percentage of Two-Party
Registration, Pennsylvania, Oregon, and California, 1924-70 237
12-1. Five Maps Showing
"Black Belt" and Voting Behavior in the South, 1948-68 251
12-2. Trend in Republican
Percentage of Total Presidential Vote, Selected Metropolitan Centers of the Rim
South, 1936-68 255
12-3. Trend in Republican
Percentage of Total Presidential Vote, Three Rural Dixiecrat Counties, 1936-68
260
12-4. Rise of Southern
Republicanism in Contests below the Presidential Level, 1950-73 266
16-1. Convergence of
Party Strength, as Shown in Democratic Proportion of Vote for Governor, U.S.
Senator, and U.S. Representative, 1926-70 334
16-2. Party
Identification of the Electorate, According to Two Public Opinion Surveys,
1952-70 344