The overview translates this diagnosis into a governance agenda that strengthens democratic practice without romanticizing non-state actors. First, it recommends a baseline legal architecture that protects association, assembly and expression while requiring proportionate transparency—annual financials, board disclosures, and public-facing impact reports—so citizens can judge claims. Second, it proposes institutional interfaces where civil society contributions improve state performance rather than bypass it: participatory budgeting pilots in municipalities, school management committees with real authority, patient charters in health facilities, and open data portals that let watchdogs test official numbers. Third, it emphasizes coalition-building across ideological lines around concrete outcomes—air quality, road safety, exam integrity—because broad-based, problem-oriented campaigns can survive political cycles. Fourth, it calls for investment in civic skills: evidence use, negotiation, digital security, and responsible communications that reduce misinformation. Fifth, it cautions against donor-driven isomorphism by advocating multi-source funding models, local philanthropy, and social enterprise hybrids that keep organizations mission-focused. The overview closes with a measurement framework: track not just events or trainings, but policy changes enacted, services improved, and citizen satisfaction shifts, using independent audits where feasible. Democracy thickens when citizens can organize, deliberate and demand results; this book shows how to make that promise routine through modest rules, competent forums and a culture of public reasoning.
Read Online
Abstract
This volume examines how Bangladesh’s civil society—NGOs, professional associations, student groups, media, trade unions, faith-based charities and community organizations—has shaped democratic practice since the 1990s. The book begins by tracing the conceptual debate: whether civil society is a sphere apart from the state and market or a set of relationships that continuously overlaps with both. It situates Bangladesh in comparative South Asian experience, noting how civic associations emerged from liberation-era networks, disaster response and microcredit innovations. Drawing on organizational case studies and policy episodes, the authors show how advocacy coalitions won space for electoral reform, women’s rights, anti-corruption initiatives and local government participation, while also documenting tensions—donor dependency, accountability gaps and urban bias. The chapters analyze media liberalization, the growth of satellite and community outlets, and the resulting shifts in agenda-setting power. Particular attention is given to mobilization around education quality, environmental protection and labor standards in export-oriented industries. The volume is realistic about trade-offs: civil society can amplify voice and bridge state capacity gaps, yet can also be co-opted, fragmented or inward-looking. The authors argue that the health of Bangladesh’s democracy rests on a plural, principled and competent civic sphere that can hold institutions to account without substituting for them. By proposing workable standards for transparency, conflict-of-interest rules and performance metrics, the book moves the conversation from abstract praise or critique to the practical craft of building credible civic platforms that earn trust over time.
How to Cite
BIISS (2002). Civil Society and Democracy in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies (BIISS). https://doi.org/10.0000/book-31-dnjnvk