BANGLADESH-BURMA RELATIONS : TEH POLITICO-ECONOMIC DIMENSIONS

This article examines the politico-economic dimensions of the bilateral relationship between Bangladesh and Burma (now Myanmar) as of the mid-1986. It analyzes the key factors that have shaped their interactions, including shared borders, historical ties, and the persistent Rohingya refugee issue. The study assesses the state of economic cooperation and trade, identifying areas of potential growth and the obstacles that have hindered closer commercial ties. The research also explores the political and security dynamics, including border management and the impact of each country's domestic politics on their foreign policy towards the other. The paper argues that despite geographical proximity, the relationship has been characterized by a mix of cooperation and tension, and concludes by evaluating the prospects for strengthening ties.

The relationship between Bangladesh and Burma is a complex tapestry woven from threads of shared history, geographical contiguity, and significant political challenges. This paper provides a detailed examination of the politico-economic dimensions of this crucial bilateral relationship. The analysis begins with an overview of the historical context, but quickly moves to the contemporary issues of the mid-1980s. A primary focus is the recurring Rohingya refugee crisis, which has been a major source of tension and a significant impediment to the development of a more robust partnership. The study evaluates the diplomatic efforts to resolve the issue and the humanitarian consequences. On the economic front, the paper assesses the limited nature of formal trade and explores the potential for expansion in sectors like agriculture and fisheries. It contrasts the formal economy with the vibrant informal cross-border trade, highlighting both its economic significance and its associated security challenges. The political dimension focuses on the differing political systems of the two countries and how these differences have influenced their diplomatic engagement. The findings suggest that while there is a clear rationale for closer cooperation based on mutual interests, the relationship remains underdeveloped, held back by a trust deficit and the unresolved refugee problem, which continues to cast a long shadow over bilateral ties.