The overview distills a practical framework for decision-makers. First, threat assessment: establish intelligence cells that track narratives, network structures, and cross-platform linkages, using privacy-preserving analytics and red-teaming to probe vulnerabilities. Second, safeguards and standards: require traceability for paid political content, expand archives of public-interest ads, and promote common provenance standards for high-risk media. Third, response playbooks: pre-position counter-messaging assets with trusted community validators; coordinate with health, disaster, and election authorities for rapid corrections; and measure reach, resonance, and rebound effects. Fourth, capacity building: invest in media-literacy curricula, newsroom tooling, and data partnerships that allow independent scrutiny of platform dynamics. The overview emphasizes proportionality and due process, warning against blunt censorship while insisting on accountability for coordinated inauthentic behavior. It proposes annual stress tests around elections and disasters and recommends a regional clearinghouse to share indicators of manipulation, benchmark responses, and scale solutions that protect both safety and free expression.
Read Online
Abstract
This monograph maps the political economy of information disorder—misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation—across South and Southeast Asia. It profiles actors (state-linked networks, profit-seeking content farms, ideological groups), platforms and encrypted channels, and the tactics they employ: synthetic amplification, deepfakes, cross-platform seeding, and micro-targeting. The study documents impacts on elections, public health, communal harmony, and disaster response, showing how low media literacy, polarized ecosystems, and opaque recommendation systems compound harm. Case studies illustrate how narratives travel across borders and languages, leveraging diasporic networks and regional grievances. The report evaluates regulatory responses, fact-checking initiatives, and platform policies, acknowledging free-expression trade-offs and risks of overreach. It proposes a layered strategy: transparent political advertising, interoperable trust signals, adversarial testing for recommender systems, legal clarity on harmful coordinated behavior, and investment in civic media. Finally, it highlights the role of universities, newsrooms, and civil society in building resilience through media literacy, open datasets, and rapid-response collaboration during high-risk events.
How to Cite
BIISS (2020). Information Disorder in the Information Age : Actors, Tactics, and Impacts in South and Southeast Asia. Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies (BIISS). https://doi.org/10.0000/monograph-47-4jllpb