It urges donors and governments to use transparent, problem-focused metrics that guide reforms rather than stigmatize countries.
Read Online
Abstract
This critique dissects popular fragility indices, highlighting conceptual overlaps, data gaps and perverse incentives. It proposes context-aware diagnostics that privilege administrative capability, service reliability and conflict resolution over composite league tables.
How to Cite
BIISS (2017). The Fallacy of Fragile State Indices : is there a 'Fragility Trap'?. Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies (BIISS). https://doi.org/10.0000/monograph-50-ebzafo