The overview emphasizes lessons for policymakers. First, small states must balance sovereignty with international obligations under the UN Charter. Second, Bangladesh should advocate for clearer criteria and multilateral oversight of interventions to prevent abuse. Third, the government should strengthen domestic capacity to manage humanitarian crises to avoid external interventions. Fourth, participation in peacekeeping provides Bangladesh with a platform to shape intervention debates. Fifth, international law reforms must ensure that humanitarian action is consistent, legitimate, and proportionate. The overview stresses that sovereignty and humanitarianism need not be contradictory if anchored in global consensus and accountability.
Read Online
Abstract
This monograph examines the complex relationship between state sovereignty and humanitarian intervention in international politics. It traces the evolution of sovereignty from the Westphalian system to contemporary global governance frameworks. The study discusses interventions in Kosovo, Somalia, and Rwanda as case studies, drawing parallels with South Asia. It analyzes how humanitarian justifications can both protect human rights and mask strategic interests. The report also highlights debates in the UN, especially regarding the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine, and considers implications for small states like Bangladesh. It concludes that while sovereignty remains a cornerstone of international relations, its practice is increasingly qualified by humanitarian imperatives.
How to Cite
BIISS (2006). State Sovereignty and Huamanitarian Intervention : Does One Negate the Other?. Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies (BIISS). https://doi.org/10.0000/monograph-53-itp8lh